Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 06:48

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
NASA Pulls the Plug on Europa Lander, but Scientists Propose a Plan B - Gizmodo
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Stocks Rise as Oil Fades and Fed Bets Sink Yields: Markets Wrap - Bloomberg.com
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Lipari Foods Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Milk in "Dark Chocolate Nonpareils" - fda.gov
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
The solar system as we know it may change forever - Notebookcheck
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Microsoft Starts Deleting Your Passwords In 6 Weeks—Act Now - Forbes
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.